Unimind wrote:
I'm somewhat colourblind and therefore have a real hard time making sense of amp gut shots posted online. It's quite a handicap when you're into amp building.
However, tell me one thing - what have you done with the extra unused 5k OT primary leads?? As I discovered in an amp I was fixing for someone, those extra leads have to stay *above* the chassis, and be taped off an wrapped up there. They must not be allowed to sit inside the chassis, where they can radiate a huge signal into the rest of the amp circuitry. There appears to be a long unshielded wire running off the Volume control pot as well - a big no no. All lomg wires to/from Gain or volume pots must be shielded. I would also say that for a high-gain amp, your wiring could maybe do with being a bit tidier.
Lindz wrote:
Hey Zaphod - my amp pretty closely replicates Unimind's buzzing sound in spite of not using the same PT and OT - mine actually does it slightly on the Normal channel too when it is cranked.
Unimind's clip was far more than a buzz problem. It's a severe case of what sounds like blocking distortion.
Unimind wrote:
I'm curious if perhaps all the brown component changes, with boost on, every control dimed we are perhaps just pushing something too hard that is a little abnormal for a typical 18 watt (seemingly in the power section judging from Unimind's ability to dial out the buzz with the PPIMV)
No, all regular 18W amps drive the snot out of their power tube grids, to quote Mr Paul Ruby. The extra preamp gain just gives more sustain in the the Brown Plexi version. Unimind's clip was far more than a buzz problem. It's a severe case of what sounds like blocking distortion.
Unimind wrote:
After finding that thread I posted above yesterday I thought it might be relevant. I researched the Ruby mod looking for a total noob layout or instructions i.e. "hook this value diode with this value resistor to this pin etc..." - something a moron who can solder could follow - i.e. me - but was unable to find an idiots guide to the Ruby moFound a couple schematics but seemingly always with the caveat "check with your scope for clipping", or a description of the mod in a thread where the reader is intended to have a better understanding of the electronics than I do. So, if you can help me with complete noob instructions and parts you think would suffice I would happily guinea pig the additional mod. I have also ordered parts for a PPIMV too just to see if I can also dial out the buzz as Unimind did.
Unimind's sound clip doesn't sound remotely anything like the Paul Ruby buzz, which is more like something mechanical vibrating inside the amp.
Unimind's clip was far more than a buzz problem. It's a severe case of what sounds like blocking distortion.
Unimind wrote:
One more dumb question - this month's guitar player features an amp mod the author calls a "snubber" that sounds like it is intended to perform similarly to the Ruby mod - "creates a filter on the primary side of the OT to remove unwanted high frequencies while leaving the rest of the frequencies untouched" - lists two 3kilo ohm 5 watt resistors, two .0047uF capacitors, and two 8.2 megaohm resistors wired as in the picture below attached "to the OT primary leads that connect to the tube sockets"
It looks like they're doing a kind of conjunctive filter, which in some cases can help get rid of some buzziness in the tone. A zobel filter on the OT secondary also does the same thing. Neither has the slightest relationship to the Paul Ruby mod. A completely different issues are being addressed.
Unimind wrote:
Zaphod, you had mentioned in the brown mods thread that the grid stoppers on el84s should be 10k and that you were thinking of trying 15k or 22k. Would that help maybe tame the signal a little on the input to the el84s? Effectively the same as dialing back the PPIMV a little?
The EL84 design guide says to use a minimum value of 10k, although in most cases the regular 8.2k used in Marshall 18W amps seems to work fine. This resistor helps reduce spikes in grid current which cause blocking distortion. So using higher values can sometimes help reduce blocking distortion problems.
Unimind wrote:
I was also thinking it was the brown mods that caused this but when I went back and listened to my clips of the amp before the mods, the buzz was already there. I think most people just do not push their 18 watts this hard and therefore do not hear it. I have found lots of cases on the net where someone is asking for help with buzz in their 18 watt when they crank it all the way up. Unfortunately I have not found any real solutions to it.
OK, you just contradicted yourself there.
In reality, some 18Ws have this problem and some don't, and no one has yet really figured out why. Plenty of folks crank their 18W amps real hard, especially the lower gain Classic and Lite II versions, which you have to crank hard to get the distortion. So far a zobel or conjunctive filter on the OT has generally proved effective in even real bad cases of buzziness.
Lindz wrote:
I have also ordered parts for a PPIMV too just to see if I can also dial out the buzz as Unimind did.
The PPIMV isn't actually fixing the problem, but rather acting as a band-aid.
kurtlives wrote:
All those resistors do is provide stability (lots included in that statement) and at high values (I'd say higher than 22K) roll off high end.
As I said already, those resistors can really help tame the grid current spikes, which cause blocking, as well as help kill ultrasonic oscillation. So larger values could be a real good idea, maybe as high as 47k or 56k.
Unimind wrote:
Other things I have read is to tame the output of the PI to not drive the PA tubes so hard. Effectively what the PPIMV is doing. So I am leaning more towards making adjustments in the PI section as a fix.
I assure you there's nothing wrong with the 18W PI. It's actually a lot less hot than a regular Fender/Marshall LTP-PI. And if you're still using 220k grid reference resistors on your power tubes, you're already driving your power tubes a lot less than a regular 18W, which uses 470k ones.
If your clip is accurate, then like I said, your amp has *severe* blocking distortion, which I suspect is caused by parasitic ultrasonic oscillation, overloading the tube grids and driving them into a blocking state. By dialling back on the postPI-MV you are simply reducing loop gain which causes the oscillations to die off. If that is the case, then the answer is to work on the layout and get rid of that oscillation, rather than apply band-aids which wills poil the amp's tone and character.
Unimind wrote:
I tried it up to 22k. Had no effect.
Try going up to 47k or 56k.
kurtlives wrote:
My suggestions was in case of failure. Your purely relying on the pot and it's qul=quality.
I've heard that quite a few times, and have yet to see an amp that has suffered any harm from pot failure, even with real old vintage amps older than me. Having said that, my personal preference is the regular 18watt.com post-PI MV, which uses a dual gang 1M pot in paralell with 1M grid reference resistors. ).01uF signal caps isolate the two DC-wise.
Unimind wrote:
So I was reading up on biasing the PI and I found this "Hot-to-centre biasing will encourage the power valves to distort more, before the phase inverter does, while colder biasing will reveal more phase-inverter distortion". After doing the math to set a colder bias I came up with 820R for the bias resistor and 75K for the tail. Now it seems to have reduced the buzz a little in the el84s. I used to have to set the PPIMV around 6-7 and now I can set it around 8-8.5 before I get the buzz so it did help a little. I also notice a bit more compressed clipping coming from the PI (which is expected when biasing colder). It actually sounds pretty good. Question for Stephen or Phil, by running the PI with those values will there be any ill effects? Will I be hurting the PI tube in any way?
This is yet another band-aid and a poor one at that, IMO. I don't believe you are yet actually dealing with the real issue - which is that there is something seriously wrong with your amp. It's not a design problem.
Lindz wrote:
I posted your buzzy clip over at ampgarage along with mine asking dopey questions - hope that is OK
http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15332I just hope that canvasing further opinions doesn't get you even more confused....
In case anyone wants to try a Zobel filter on the OT secondary, Randy Fay aka ontariomaximus recommends the following:
Quote:
I typically use 10R + 2.2uf on the 8 ohm tap and is permanently wired, but 20ohm + 1uf would be a starting point for the 16 ohm tap.
You can connect a filter of the appropriate values to either the 8 ohm or the 16 ohm tap and just leave them there, regardless of what speaker impedance you're using.