joeyvelour wrote:
For live applications my keyboard players used a full range monitor for themselves and some stage volume, and then we ran DI off of the keyboard mixer through the FOH.
Yah, me too. I've been playing electronic kbds for over 25 years, ~ 10 of that professionally. I was never happy with standalone amps for keyboards. I settled on a small mixer (Mackie 1202) directly to the PA. Monitoring was sent from my mixer thru a stereo eq into a pa-style rack amp. I used a pair of smallish full range Toa monitors....one for me, the other was usually side-fill for the band. Still have that rig. Currently, I run keys directly thru a mixer/studio monitor setup. Can't beat a full range system for synths!
joeyvelour wrote:
Try not to get sucked in with the fancy ads. Things haven't necessarily improved that much in the past 10 to 15 years.
I absolutely agree with jv on this. Much of the progress in kbd tech that has been made in the last couple of decades has been in digital workstation capabilities that many of us will never use. Many of these instruments are highly capable, but the advanced features are far from user-friendly. The learning curve can be steep, to say the least. I prefer keyboards that focus on sound creation, rather than recording projects. These days, I primarily use a Kurzweil PC2 with an old Roland JD-990 rack synth and an Alesis Quadrasynth slaved to it. I love the sound of the PC2, but recommend against it due to the arcane interface and lack of community resources. It is totally worthwhile to find a keyboard with a good user community out there....especially if the keyboard can easily export and import patches. You can learn a lot from other people's sounds, & you may find just the sound you need for free.
Also, when auditioning keyboards, I recommend listening to them thru a moderately decent (or better) set of headphones...preferably your own. This takes amplification and environment out of the equation.